Pro-Polygamy.com
Helping the Media & Information-gatherers by providing
news, reports, and insights from the pro-polygamy view.

  MEDIA:   Interview Requests    Join Media List  
  Pro-Polygamists:   Join NOTICES List    Links 


<-- Previous          Next -->

Op-Ed

End Marriage Control from Both Sides - The Win-Win Solution

     By: Mark Henkel
Date: Dec 01, 2009
Word Count: 600 words
Cross-Reference: Ending marriage control, polygamy rights win-win solution


. . A SPECIAL OP-ED
. . . . . . . by Mark Henkel  
 
 
Mark Henkel is the National Polygamy Advocate and the Founder of the TruthBearer.org organization. He has been interviewed and reported by numerous national media, including ABC’s 20/20, NBC’s TODAY Show, CourtTV (TruTV), 700 Club, Newsweek, Associated Press, Washington Times, and many more as noted at http://www.TruthBearer.org/media/.
See www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com .



Exposing the hypocrisy of both sides of the marriage control war, the national polygamy rights movement for consenting adults offers the polygamy rights win-win solution for resolving the issue once and for all.

"The Emperor is wearing no clothes" on both sides of the marriage control war.   In the latest battle, Maine's "People’s Veto" of L.D. 1020, neither side was ever going to resolve anything.   Indeed, the winning YES-side has not actually protected marriage.   The losing NO-side was not going to actually protect marriage equality.   However, a win-win solution proposed by consenting adult pro-polygamists can now free us all from both sides' "naked" hypocrisy. 

The anthropological and biblical definitions of marriage have always included polygamy.   Hence, one-man/one-woman and same sex marriage both re-define marriage.    

One-man/one-woman proponents were the first ones to re-define marriage.   Overlooking the Bible's numerous polygamists, they based their re-definition on the Adam and Eve story and "one flesh" verse in the first two chapters of Genesis. Yet, author Moses was married to two wives - "one flesh" with each of them.   Plus, Adam and Eve were never married by government.   Indeed, government marriage never happened in the Bible.   Even so, one-man/one-woman activists became the original marriage controllers to turn to big government, to re-define marriage, and to give themselves special rights. 

Today, another re-definition has emerged: same sex marriage.   Previously, due to the anatomical impossibility of coitus between same sex partners, marriage's definition never included same sex marriage.   Now, however, by copying the same tactics of the one-man/one-woman marriage controllers before them, same sex marriage activists have become the new marriage controllers to turn to big government, to re-define marriage, and to give themselves special rights too. 

Supporters of marriage control by either form have a right to their imaginations - even though inaccurate.   However, neither side has the right to re-define marriage or to receive special rights for those imaginations.   New marriage control for same sex marriage is as wrong as original marriage control for one-man/one-woman.   It is still tyranny, discrimination, and hypocrisy. 

First, marriage control does not protect marriage; it uses big government to control doctrine.   But marriage is a God-given individual right, pre-dating government itself.   Government is for protecting individual rights - not for majorities controlling doctrines.   Hence, marriage control is as anti-freedom as Gospel control, Baptism control, and the Lord’s Table control (as well as Passover control or Ramadan control).   If any majority tried to legally re-define and control these other doctrines, most religious one-man/one-woman supporters would be screaming, “Tyranny!” 

Second, Maine's defeated same sex marriage law absolutely did not end discrimination.   It did not protect marriage equality for all unrelated consenting adults. The specific law, L.D. 1020, re-wrote the "Prohibited marriages" statute, striking out Clause 5 (same sex marriage), while leaving Clause 4 (polygamy) unchanged.   The law arbitrarily discriminated a limit of "two people" - giving same sex partners special treatment while expressly denying consenting adult polygamists.   If this marriage control happened in reverse, same sex marriage activists would be screaming, "Discrimination!" 

Third, marriage control is based on hypocrisy.   One-man/one-woman proponents say that children need a father and a mother.   Same sex marriage supporters say that children simply need two adults. Yet, in a society overflowing with abandoned single moms and marriage-phobic males, both sides ban consenting adult polygamy – even though it more than answers both sides’ arguments.   If Heather can have two mommies, why can’t she have two mommies and a daddy?   Hypocrisy!  

Telling the "naked emperor" on both sides to "get dressed," consenting adult pro-polygamists propose a win-win solution out of all this hypocrisy.   It's limited government: abolish marriage control for unrelated consenting adults.   Then marriage will never be re-defined by anyone.   No one will have special rights.   Whether same sex marriage, one-man/one-woman, or consenting adult polygamy, everyone will truly be free.   Thereby, the marriage control war ends and everyone wins.   Freedom! 


###


Bibliographic URLs:

L.D. 1020 - Maine's repealed same sex marriage statute 
http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/bills_124th/billtexts/SP038401.asp 
 
 
National Polygamy Advocate, Mark Henkel, at Public Hearing, Apr. 22, 2009 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZkYETe3yzg 
 
 
“Maine Legalizes Gay Marriage,” May 6, 2009 
http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/story.php?id=255044 
 
 
Yes vs. No Debate on People’s Veto to repeal LD 1020, Oct. 28, 2009 
http://www.wmtw.com/video/21458064/index.html 
 
 
Maine’s People’s Veto Repeals LD 1020 
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iGQ6LMSOvL9rjDHrAmyO9mHoVieAD9BOHE5G1 
 
 
Polygamy Rights Win-Win Solution 
http://www.pro-polygamy.com/articles.php?news=0057 
http://thephoenix.com/Portland/News/93135-Objecting-to-marriage-control/
 
 
 
 
[Reviewed for publication - Pro-Polygamy.com Review Board.]



Pro-Polygamy supporters! Be notifed of latest
 Alerts/Releases.    Subscribe to NOTICES list. 

Enter Address:
PREVIOUS Headline
2009 Aug 19
Pro-Polygamists Celebrate 9th Annual Polygamy Day ®
On August 19, 2009, consenting-adult pro-polygamists throughout America are celebrating "Polygamy Day 9." 
NEXT Headline
2009 Dec 26
“Facebook’s Anti-Privacy Settings” Exposed Polygamy Activists
With the rollout of its new supposed "Privacy Settings," Facebook.com breached its website's past-promises to protect privacy, publicly exposing and endangering pro-polygamists and any other activists of any oppressed constituency in any country.

  MEDIA:   Interview Requests    Join Media List  
  Pro-Polygamists:   Join NOTICES List    Links 

www.Pro-Polygamy.com





Latest Headlines
From the Archives of
Pro-Polygamy Articles


2017 Aug 07
Finding Polygamists 'Guilty of Polygamy' Pushes Canada Backwards
After anti-polygamy law deemed "constitutional" to criminalize in Canada, one lone judge finds two leaders of Bountiful group "guilty of polygamy," even as case involved only adult women and no other real crimes.


2017 Jun 25
Pro-Polygamists Glad that Fugitive Lyle Jeffs was Caught
"It's like déjà vu all over again." Mark Henkel, National Polygamy Advocate and founder of the TruthBearer.org organization, responds to the news and is available to media for comment.


2017 Feb 01
Supreme Court Declined to Hear 'Sister Wives' Polygamy case
SCOTUS denied even hearing the Brown v. Buhman petition, letting the appeals court's reversal stand, not even hearing any of the pro-polygamy merits, and bringing the whole issue back to the status quo.


2017 Jan 01
Will Supreme Court Hear 'Sister Wives' Polygamy case in 2017?
As Brown v. Buhman case petitions SCOTUS, "Article 3 standing" technicalities could deny any "merits" of arguments from even being heard.


2016 Aug 19
Pro-Polygamists Celebrate 16th Annual 'Polygamy Day'
On August 19, 2016, unrelated consenting adult polygamy supporters (UCAPs) are celebrating "Polygamy Day 16" – the sixteenth year of annual Polygamy Day ® celebrations. 


2016 Aug 10
Last Steps for Polygamy Heading to Supreme Court in 2017


2015 Aug 19
Pro-Polygamists Celebrate 15th Annual 'Polygamy Day'


2015 Jun 28
Obergefell – Half-Right & Half-Wrong (Still Against Polygamy)


2015 Jun 27
SCOTUS: States Must License Same Sex Marriage (but not Polygamy)


2014 Sep 02
Judge Awards Damages to Polygamists for Utah Violating Rights




Read More
From the Archives of
Pro-Polygamy Articles





Copyright © 2003 - 2017     ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
"Pro-Polygamy.com" is an exclusive legal Trademark of Pro-Polygamy.com ™ .