Helping the Media & Information-gatherers by providing
news, reports, and insights from the pro-polygamy view.

Click to order DVD
Order Your Pro-Polygamy Passport ™

No Marriage Amendment by 2nd Anniversary of Lawrence v. Texas

Date: Jun 26, 2005
Word Count: 400 words
Cross-Reference: Lawrence v. Texas, 2nd anniversary, Pro-polygamists

Two years after the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision, conservative pro-polygamists celebrate passage of another anniversary without passage of a big government federal marriage amendment.

Old Orchard Beach, MAINE, June 26, 2005 -- -- Two years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Lawrence v. Texas. Today, as is observed using that anniversary to debut its web-site's re-design, pro-polygamists in general are happily marking that decision's second-year anniversary. 
Mark Henkel, the national polygamy advocate and founder of the (non-Mormon) Christian Polygamy organization, ( ), noted, "Two years after that decision, there is still no federal marriage amendment. Yes, we are quite happy that such conservatism-turned-liberalism has not succeeded so far." 
But the battle is far from over. Several state marriage amendments were passed and many marriage amendment leaders still demand a federal version. 
While sympathetic to such conservative reactions, conservative pro-polygamists note that the amendment tactic to address the biological impossibility of "gay marriage" is more liberal and dangerous than the issue itself. Tactically, the true conservative solution is that of limited government. 
Henkel explained, "'Government marriage' has no association with actually Biblical marriage. The Bible's polygamous heroes never needed 'government marriage.' Indeed, no one in the Bible was ever married 'by government.' So, really, any marriage amendment is not Biblical and only seeks to more liberally codify 'government marriage' socialism." 
From limited government principles, any government that is liberally authorized to re-define marriage any one particular way - such as, "one man, one woman" - is just as liberally authorized to later re-define it another way - to even include "same sex marriage."  
"That's not protection," said Henkel. "Even passed amendments can be repealed. That's why the obvious liberalism of a big government marriage amendment genuinely does not protect true marriage. It actually jeopardizes marriage while simultaneously justifying even more socialist government." 
Removing big government from marriage equally removes any arguments for legalized "homosexual marriage." Thereby, no one would be forced to recognize any other asserted forms of marriage - real, fictional, or otherwise. 
"That is the true conservative position of limited government and why it would more accurately value real Biblical marriage,'" explained Henkel. 
Even so, since the first-year anniversary of Lawrence v. Texas a year ago, the federal marriage amendment failed in both Congressional houses. "While the Republican-turning-liberal Party subsequently won the 2004 election," commented Henkel, "one state amendment has already been overturned and the required support to ratify another federal attempt remains insufficient." 
Reaching the second anniversary passage without any federal marriage amendment passage, polygamy activists are indeed optimistic. 


Bibliographic URLs: 

Click to order DVD

Latest Headlines

From the Archives of
Pro-Polygamy Articles

2018 Aug 19
Pro-Polygamists Celebrate 18th Annual 'Polygamy Day'
On August 19, 2018, unrelated consenting adult polygamy supporters (UCAPs) are celebrating "Polygamy Day 18" - the eighteenth year of annual Polygamy Day ® celebrations.

2018 Aug 07
National Polygamy Advocate PODCAST Archiving Media Interviews
Posting past media interviews, not only is this historic new podcast archiving history, but it is making history too.

2018 Jul 25 Celebrates 15 Years of News & Views to Media
From 2003, the first & only web-site to distribute real news & views from the pro-polygamy view to the media, is now 15 years old.

2018 Jul 03
Canadian Judge Sentences Polygamists to House Arrest, Not Jail
After pushing Canada backwards by finding two men "guilty of polygamy" in 2017, the same Judge decided to not sentence them to jail in 2018.

Read More
From the Archives of
Pro-Polygamy Articles


Media or Pro-Polygamists

© Copyright 2003 - 2019       ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
"" is an exclusive legal Trademark of ™.